Robert Mavrinac
2015-06-23 14:04:28 UTC
I have built a new i386 LTSP-PNP server, and "inxi -G" on the server yields:
Graphics: Card: Matrox Systems MGA G200eW WPCM450
Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: mga (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
Resolution: ***@59.88hz, ***@59.88hz
GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.5, 128 bits) GLX Version: 3.0 Mesa 10.3.2
The clients are mostly Atom N270 with Intel 945GSE integrated graphics.
As a fat client, "inxi -G" on the client yields:
Graphics: Card: Intel Mobile 945GSE Express Ingegrated Graphics Controller
Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: N/A
Resolution: ***@60.00hz
GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel x86/MMX/SSE2
GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 10.3.2
Question #1:
If the package xserver-xorg-video-intel is providing the graphics card support, why is "inxi -G" reporting "drivers: N/A"? Surely I don't need a proprietary driver.
Question #2:
If I run the client as a thin client, a notice displays that the desktop is "Running in software rendering mode". Isn't a thin client supposed to be using it's local X server and video drivers?
Graphics: Card: Matrox Systems MGA G200eW WPCM450
Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: mga (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
Resolution: ***@59.88hz, ***@59.88hz
GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 3.5, 128 bits) GLX Version: 3.0 Mesa 10.3.2
The clients are mostly Atom N270 with Intel 945GSE integrated graphics.
As a fat client, "inxi -G" on the client yields:
Graphics: Card: Intel Mobile 945GSE Express Ingegrated Graphics Controller
Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: N/A
Resolution: ***@60.00hz
GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel x86/MMX/SSE2
GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 10.3.2
Question #1:
If the package xserver-xorg-video-intel is providing the graphics card support, why is "inxi -G" reporting "drivers: N/A"? Surely I don't need a proprietary driver.
Question #2:
If I run the client as a thin client, a notice displays that the desktop is "Running in software rendering mode". Isn't a thin client supposed to be using it's local X server and video drivers?